Close

Boston Lawyer Blog

Updated:

The Supreme Judicial Court’s Opinion in “In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation” Offers Fleeting Protection on a Misreading of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. United States

On January 12, the Supreme Judicial Court issued an opinion, In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation, which held that a grand jury subpoena, issued to a law firm for a cell phone containing text messages or other communications that the Commonwealth contended were evidence of a crime, and…

Updated:

US DOJ Adds its Interpretation of Title VII to List of Federal Entities Recognizing Protection for Transgender Rights

The United States Justice Department (DOJ) recently announced that it will interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as protecting transgender employees from discrimination in the workplace.  In a December 15, 2014 memo to U.S. Attorneys, Attorney General Eric Holder stated that he has “determined that the…

Updated:

Crayton & Collins: Preventing Eyewitness Misidentification in Massachusetts

“Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in 72% of convictions overturned through DNA testing.” —Innocence Project. Two cases recently decided on the same day by the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) have made important strides in helping prevent wrongful convictions due to misidentification. …

Updated:

Change in Federal Law Regarding Marijuana Enforcement is Important for Massachusetts

A new federal spending law enshrines in statutory form the policy that federal agents will no longer seek to interfere with medical marijuana retail establishments in states where they are legal.  As Massachusetts law with regard to marijuana possession and use continues to evolve, this change lessens the likelihood that…

Updated:

Pregnant Women Are Entitled to Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace Under the Americans with Disabilities Act

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Young v. UPS, a case that examines what protections pregnant workers have under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”).  As I explained in detail earlier this week, the issue in Young is whether an employer who accommodates some of its workers by…

Updated:

Supreme Court Will Decide Scope of Protection for Pregnant Workers in Young v. UPS

When she became pregnant in 2006, Peggy Young’s doctor told her not to lift more than 20 pounds during the early part of her pregnancy, and no more than 10 thereafter.  Upon hearing of this restriction, Young’s employer, UPS, refused to let her stay in her job, as she occasionally…

Updated:

New Case Illustrates the Strict Limits of Wiretapping in Massachusetts

The image of an informant wearing a wire or secretly recording phone conversations during a criminal investigation is extremely common on television and in the movies.  In Massachusetts, however, the use of a wiretap as an investigative tool of law enforcement is subject to extremely strict limits and protections that…

Updated:

Harvard Business School Study Shows that Subtle Gender Discrimination in Workplace Can Lead to Significant Disparities in Senior Leadership Roles

Researchers at Harvard Business School (HBS) and Hunter College recently issued a report based on their survey of more than 25,000 HBS graduates on issues related to work, family responsibilities, and the gender gap in senior management positions in the workplace. The study concludes that these highly educated and ambitious…

Updated:

The Federal and Massachusetts Anti-Discrimination Agencies Both Say That Parental Leave Must Be Provided Equally to Men and Women

Just over 36 years ago, on October 31, 1978, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”) was signed into law, extending the protections of Title VII to pregnant women. This summer, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued new enforcement guidance on pregnancy discrimination, explaining how both the PDA/Title VII and the…